دانلود رایگان ترجمه مقاله تحلیل مفهومی متغیرهای میانجی و واسطه در تحقیقات کسب و کار (نشریه الزویر 2016) (ترجمه رایگان – برنزی ⭐️)
این مقاله انگلیسی ISI در نشریه الزویر در 15 صفحه در سال 2016 منتشر شده و ترجمه آن 23 صفحه میباشد. کیفیت ترجمه این مقاله رایگان – برنزی ⭐️ بوده و به صورت کامل ترجمه شده است.
دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی + خرید ترجمه فارسی | |
عنوان فارسی مقاله: |
تحلیل مفهومی متغیرهای میانجی و واسطه در تحقیقات کسب و کار |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: |
Conceptual Analysis of Moderator and Mediator Variables in Business Research |
|
مشخصات مقاله انگلیسی (PDF) | |
سال انتشار | 2016 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 15 صفحه با فرمت pdf |
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله | مدیریت کسب و کار، سیاست های تحقیق و توسعه |
چاپ شده در مجله (ژورنال) | اولین کنفرانس بین المللی اقتصاد کاربردی و کسب و کار – 1st International Conference on Applied Economics and Business |
کلمات کلیدی | تحقیق کسب و کار، متغیر های واسطه ای و میانجی، واسط گری، کارت امتیازی متوازن |
رفرنس | دارد ✓ |
کد محصول | F1426 |
نشریه | الزویر – Elsevier |
مشخصات و وضعیت ترجمه فارسی این مقاله | |
وضعیت ترجمه | انجام شده و آماده دانلود |
تعداد صفحات ترجمه تایپ شده با فرمت ورد با قابلیت ویرایش | 23 صفحه (1 صفحه رفرنس انگلیسی) با فونت 14 B Nazanin |
ترجمه عناوین تصاویر و جداول | ترجمه شده است ✓ |
ترجمه متون داخل تصاویر | ترجمه نشده است ☓ |
ترجمه متون داخل جداول | ترجمه نشده است ☓ |
درج تصاویر در فایل ترجمه | درج شده است ✓ |
درج جداول در فایل ترجمه | درج شده است ✓ |
کیفیت ترجمه | کیفیت ترجمه این مقاله پایین میباشد |
فهرست مطالب |
چکیده |
بخشی از ترجمه |
چکیده |
بخشی از مقاله انگلیسی |
Abstract The major purpose of this article is to expand the domain of the business research by providing conceptual analysis of the moderating and mediating variables and exploring their potent effects in business research. To provide specific implications, Kang et al. (2015) model with respect to Balanced Scorecard technique is conceptually extended. Theoretical foundation of the moderating, mediating, and their major distinctions along with appropriate statistical tests applicable to each situation are also provided. The model is also extended to analyzing interaction effects of Mediated-Moderation and Moderated-Mediation designs and their testing. The article concludes that: 1) the nature of complex business problems will be more transparently captured by considering moderating and mediating variables, 2) without specifying moderating and mediating variables, business models are incomplete and therefore are not able to solve real business obstacles. Lack of inclusion of moderating and mediating effects is one viable reason which indicates why most business models do not function in real practice, 3) moderating and mediating variables are widening the scope of the prevalent business theories, and 4) moderating and moderating variables makes it possible to respond to the inquiries regarding “when” “how” and “why” a particular relationship exists between the independent and dependent variables. Hence, this study posits great impacts in future correlational and experimental studies in business. 1- Introduction A famous aphorism in statistics, which is originated by professor Box (1976), the great statistician of the 20 century, is that “all world’s models are wrong”, because they are abstracting the reality so much. On the contrary, it is argued that because of the impossibility of capturing complex realities into a model, some kind of abstraction is mandatory. While this argument stems from the facts, a critical inquiry is: to be useful, how much abstraction should be made in establishing a particular model? Despite a lack of any unambiguous rule in this regard, a general guideline in every disciplines tends to call on scientists to establish a sumptuous model in an attempt to get surrounding to reality as much as possible. The general motivation of this article is to provide a conceptual analysis for extending the reality into models. This analysis is comprehensive and can be applied to any discipline such as engineering, hard sciences, social sciences, agricultures and medical sciences. However, in order to be specific, merely business models in the context of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) (Kaplan & Norton, 1992), which is a contemporary universally multidisciplinary technique, will be discussed.In most modern business models,(e. g., Farooq and Hussain, 2011; Karabulut, 2015; and Kang et. al, 2015) when experimental and causal designs are exerted, researchers’ effort is usually focused solely on analyzing the relationship between dependent and independent variables to study designated obstacles. For instance, in the domain of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), Karabulut (2015) investigates the effect of innovation on the performance of the manufacturing firms based on the BSC and it’s four perspectives. Fig1 shows the study’s design. By applying multiple regression analysis, the author reports that the product, process and organizational innovations show a positive effect on all four BSC perspectives. However, the marketing innovation demonstrates a positive impact only on financial, customer, and internal business processes perspectives and a negative impact on the learning and growth performance. In a more elaborate study, Kang et al. (2015) study the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Family Hotels’ Financial Performance (FHFP) based on the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC) – Financial (FIN), Customer (CUS),Internal business (INT), Learning and growth (L & G),Non-market (social and environmental) perspectives, and hotels’ Goals(GOA) and Vision (VIS). Fig 2 shows the research design. By identifying three groups of stakeholders (managers, employees and customers) and applying Partial Regression, the authors found that: 1) CSR exhibits a significant influence on SBSC for both managers and employees group, 2) CSR shows a significant relation with goals for all stakeholders groups and 3) all stakeholders confirm a causal relation among BSC perspectives. Although these studies report interesting results, the findings seem somehow spurious and illusory, because reported results are confined to limited research designs which suffer from, at least, three acute shortcomings: parsimony, rationality problems and external validity threats. The first weakness relates to abstracting reality and lacking inclusion of adequate appropriate variables to capture the true nature of the study. The second problem is in regard to the inability of research designs in identifying the true relationship which is dominated between dependent and independent variables as well as with other variables which are ignored by researchers. The third obstacle stems from the potential of generalizability of findings from samples to populations of the studies. Hence, the major inquiry is: what are the effects of these subtle deficiencies on findings of the studies and how can they be solved? The major purpose of this research is responding to the preceding inquiry by conceptually describing, analyzing and testing the effects of Moderator (MO) and Mediator (ME) variables and their interactions- Mediated-Moderation and Moderated-Mediation effects. In order to be more precise, the design of Kang et al.’s (2015) study, which is more elaborate than many preceding research, will be extended, The importance of this research relates to defining and analyzing potential impacts of MO and ME, their interactions and behaviors in business research. Hence, it provides a potent theoretical basis for conducting more comprehensive empirical studies to analyze complex business problems more truly and accurately. The study also contributes to contemporary knowledge about research designs, and causes refining prevalent business theories, which entails to more insightful, real and valid findings. The organization of the research is as follows. Sections II and III describe the nature, characteristics and testing of the moderating and mediating variables respectively. Major distinctions of the moderating and mediatizing variables are discussed in section IV, and the effect, testing and extensions of mediated-moderation and moderated-mediation are explored in section V. Section VI provides discussions, conclusions, suggestions and limitations of the study. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی + خرید ترجمه فارسی | |
عنوان فارسی مقاله: |
تحلیل مفهومی متغیرهای میانجی و واسطه در تحقیقات کسب و کار |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: |
Conceptual Analysis of Moderator and Mediator Variables in Business Research |
|