این مقاله انگلیسی ISI در نشریه امرالد در 24 صفحه در سال 2015 منتشر شده و ترجمه آن 11 صفحه میباشد. کیفیت ترجمه این مقاله رایگان – برنزی ⭐️ بوده و به صورت ناقص ترجمه شده است.
دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی + خرید ترجمه فارسی | |
عنوان فارسی مقاله: |
مرز و تکامل تئوری مدیریت استراتژیک: تحلیل سیستماتیک مدیریت مجله مدیریت استراتژیک، 2001-2012 |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: |
The frontier and evolution of the strategic management theory: A scientometric analysis of Strategic Management Journal, 2001-2012 |
|
مشخصات مقاله انگلیسی (PDF) | |
سال انتشار | 2015 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 24 صفحه با فرمت pdf |
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله | مدیریت کسب و کار و مدیریت استراتژیک |
چاپ شده در مجله (ژورنال) | مجله بین المللی بررسی کسب و کار نانکای – Nankai Business Review International |
کلمات کلیدی | مدیریت راهبردی، گرایش ها، روش های سنجش علمی، قرن بیست و یک |
رفرنس | دارد ✓ |
کد محصول | F1310 |
نشریه | امرالد – Emerald |
مشخصات و وضعیت ترجمه فارسی این مقاله | |
وضعیت ترجمه | انجام شده و آماده دانلود |
تعداد صفحات ترجمه تایپ شده با فرمت ورد با قابلیت ویرایش | 11 صفحه با فونت 14 B Nazanin |
ترجمه عناوین تصاویر و جداول | ترجمه شده است ✓ |
ترجمه متون داخل تصاویر | ترجمه نشده است ☓ |
ترجمه متون داخل جداول | ترجمه نشده است ☓ |
درج تصاویر در فایل ترجمه | درج شده است ✓ |
درج جداول در فایل ترجمه | درج شده است ✓ |
کیفیت ترجمه | کیفیت ترجمه این مقاله متوسط میباشد |
توضیحات | چند بخش اول این مقاله ترجمه شده است |
فهرست مطالب |
چکیده |
بخشی از ترجمه |
چکیده 1. طراحی تحقیقات |
بخشی از مقاله انگلیسی |
Abstract Purpose – This paper aims to help scholars to know the frontiers in the strategic management field. On studying, it was noted that business strategic management originated from America in the 1960s and has experienced more than half a century. However, strategic management development lacks systematical summary in the twenty-first century. The scientometric method was appliedto find out the frontiers and progress of the research of strategic management in the twenty-first century, based on the literature from 2001 to 2012 in the Strategic Management Journal. Design/methodology/approach – In the paper, the authors mainly used the scientometric method and applied keywords, co-occurrence method combined with multistatistical methods and mutation words analysis, author co-citation, literature co-citation and keywords co-occurrence (national). Findings – The findings show that the strategic management research focuses on the following theories and academic thoughts: knowledge-based view, network organization research and dynamic capability are the mainstream; besides, strategy risk, the stakeholders analysis of strategy management, corporate reputation and strategic concept also attract the attention of researchers; Barney, Teece and Porter have made significant contributions to strategy management research since the twenty-first century. Originality/value – The findings in the paper will help scholars in the field of strategic management to know the main frontiers of the theory, as well as the main contributors.. Strategic management theory has significantly developed and has been used in guiding the business practice systematically since the 1960s. There are three important stages in the developing process: classic strategic theory, competitive strategic theory and resource-based view theory. Since the start of the twenty-first century, economic globalization, fast development of technical innovation and the advent of the information age have made strategic management work a requirement that can often be out of step with practice. Reviewing the continually growing foundation, we attempt to grasp the frontier and to identify the direction the management theory is going. Based on the recent strategic management documentation with the quantitative analysis of the scientometric method, this paper tries to describe the new trend of the strategic management field in the twenty-first century to determine the frontier of strategic management theory for further revelations regarding the scientific community (the first endogenous factor) (Bowman et al., 2002) and the basic theory (the second endogenous factor) (Furrer et al., 2008) which promotes its development. Mining local knowledge (exogenous factor) (Hoskisson et al., 1999) on the influence of strategic management theory development from the angle of a particular country, the paper explores the direction of strategic management theory involution in the future. 1. Research design 1.1 Research method Scientometric analysis is a way and method of using the mathematic statistical principle and computer analysis method to study a document’s external character, including author, keywords, bibliography and geographical information (Yue, 2008), to explore the features of a document and the knowledge structure and developing property of its subjects. Word frequency and co-occurrence analysis of the keywords, co-citation analysis technology of author and quotation and multivariate statistical analysis are widely used in the analysis of subject knowledge structure. These quantitative analysis methods effectively avoid the influence of subjective ideas and blind knowledge zones in reviewing documents; therefore, they are also used in combing strategic management theory (Ramos-Rodriguez and and Ruiz-Navarro, 2004; Nerur et al., 2008; Ronda-Pupo and Guerras-Martin, 2010; Liu, 2005; Jianhua and Yue, 2007). Combining the visual technical method (Chen, 2009), this paper will synthetically use these effective methods to discover the developing status of strategic management theory subject. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی + خرید ترجمه فارسی | |
عنوان فارسی مقاله: |
مرز و تکامل تئوری مدیریت استراتژیک: تحلیل سیستماتیک مدیریت مجله مدیریت استراتژیک، 2001-2012 |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: |
The frontier and evolution of the strategic management theory: A scientometric analysis of Strategic Management Journal, 2001-2012 |
|