دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی مدیریت زنجیره ای تهیه و تولید در بازارهای نوظهور به همراه ترجمه فارسی
| عنوان فارسی مقاله: | مدیریت زنجیره ای تهیه و تولید در بازارهای نوظهور |
| عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: | Supply chain management in emerging markets |
| رشته های مرتبط: | مدیریت و مهندسی صنایع، لجستیک و زنجیره تامین، مدیریت صنعتی، تولید و عملیات |
| فرمت مقالات رایگان | مقالات انگلیسی و ترجمه های فارسی رایگان با فرمت PDF میباشند |
| کیفیت ترجمه | کیفیت ترجمه این مقاله متوسط میباشد |
| نشریه | الزویر – Elsevier |
| کد محصول | F470 |
|
مقاله انگلیسی رایگان (PDF) |
دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
|
ترجمه فارسی رایگان (PDF) |
دانلود رایگان ترجمه مقاله |
|
خرید ترجمه با فرمت ورد |
خرید ترجمه مقاله با فرمت ورد |
| جستجوی ترجمه مقالات | جستجوی ترجمه مقالات |
|
بخشی از ترجمه فارسی مقاله: 2. مرور کلی بر موضوع خاص |
|
بخشی از مقاله انگلیسی: 2. Overview of the special issue What makes emerging economies a unique context to study supply chain management? Emerging markets are “low-income, rapid growth countries using economic liberalization as their primary engine of growth” (Hoskisson et al., 2000), where institutions are undergoing fundamental and continuous changes. The most unique features that seriously challenge effective supply chain management are institutional voids, including shallow capital markets, deficient legal systems, lack of independent accounting intermediaries, and etc. (Khanna and Palepu, 1997). In large emerging markets, institutional voids also influence regional economic development, leading to subnational variations within the same country (Zhou and Poppo, 2010). Accordingly, companies must develop alternative operations management strategies and adjust their strategic decisions to overcome institutional voids. The call for papers generated 50 submissions, among which six manuscripts were finally accepted after three or four rounds of review. These six papers include survey research, case studies, and archival data research, and use samples of Chinese firms, Indian companies, and American firms that outsource in emerging markets. They also address explicitly the methodological issues (e.g., endogeneity and common method bias) indicated by the recent JOM Editorial (Guide and Ketokivi, 2015). The papers cover a variety of topics including: How to deal with role hazard between buyers and suppliers caused by sub-national institutional distance? How do social management capabilities help multinational buyers and their emerging market suppliers respond to stakeholder pressures, address regulatory gaps, and improve social performance? How does institutional deficiency affect contractual inefficiency and consequently ties utilization of emerging market firms? How do outsourcing, in-house offshoring, and sales to emerging markets affect product recalls and inventory performance? How do buyer-supplier compatibility and institutional environment affect product co-development between buyers and suppliers? How to reduce local supplier opportunism in China when facing regulatory uncertainty? Collectively, these papers provide fresh insights into how institutional environments in emerging markets affect operation management strategies and how companies develop supply chain management strategies to deal with institutional voids. In Dong, Ju, and Fang’s article, the authors introduce an important notion, role hazard, which represents a critical yet understudied relational coordination problem. Their study shows that subnational institutional distance leads to role ambiguity and conflict, two important facets of role hazards between buyers and suppliers, which in turn jeopardize supply chain performance. To mitigate such problem, supply chain partners could share information and adapt to the changing environments continuously. These findings provide a novel perspective on how supply chain partners foster relational coordination by reducing role hazards caused by subnational institutional distance in emerging markets. Huq, Chowdhury, and Klassen use multiple case studies from before and after the Rana Plaza building collapse in Bangladesh to develop an understanding of the skills, practices, relationships and processes (collectively referred as social management capabilities) that help firms in emerging markets to improve their performance on human safety & welfare, and social & community development. Specifically, they attempt to address two research questions: What are the social management capabilities needed by multinational buyers and their emerging market suppliers to improve social performance and respond to stakeholder pressures? How do external factors and shocks affect the development and evolution of these capabilities in emerging markets? Their findings provide novel insights on how multinational buyers and local suppliers achieve social performance in emerging markets. Shou, Zheng, and Zhu address another critical issue in emerging markets: contractual ineffectiveness, the difficulty of using contracts to safeguard and coordinate transactions between supply chain partners. The authors show that legal enforceability and information transparency lead to contractual inefficiency, which in turn promotes a firm’s efforts to seek political and business ties. They also find that efficiency pressure and equity pressures differentially moderate the relationships between contractual inefficiency and pursuit of social ties. These results provide important implications on the alternative and dynamic use of contracts and social ties in supply chain management in emerging markets. Steven and Britto study three different forms of emerging market penetration (i.e., outsourcing, in-house offshoring, and sales to emerging markets) and their associations with product recalls. They find that outsourcing penetration increases recalls whereas sales penetration reduces recalls. Although they cannot find a direct relationship between in-house offshoring and recalls, they show that in-house offshoring is able to mitigate the positive relationship between outsourcing and recalls. They further investigate how emerging markets’ characteristics (e.g., institutional immaturity) moderate these relationships. Their results provide a finer understanding of the complex relationships among different forms of emerging market penetration and product recalls. Wang, Li, and Chang focus on how buyer-supplier compatibility influences product co-development between buyers and suppliers in China. They find that while knowledge commonality has an inverted U-shaped relationship with product co-development, goal compatibility has a positive effect on product codevelopment. Moreover, mutual learning partially mediates the effects of buyer-supplier compatibility on product co-development. They further consider how formal and informal institutional environments (i.e., government intervention and guanxi importance) moderate the relationship between mutual learning and product co-development differently. Their research provides important theoretical and managerial implications for buyer-supplier collaboration in emerging markets. Wang, Zhang, Wang, and Sheng examine contracts and trust as two alternative governance modes in curtailing opportunism in China. They argue that the effects of these two governance strategies in reducing opportunism depend on two institutionrelated factors: regulatory uncertainty and relationship structure in the Chinese markets. The authors show that contracts are more effective in deterring supplier opportunism when regulatory uncertainty is high. In addition, contracts help curtail opportunism more in domestic, compared with international, buyeresupplier relationships, whereas trust is more effective in restricting supplier opportunism in international relationships than in domestic ones. Taken together, these articles indicate that institutional environments play a critical role in supply chain management in emerging markets. Equally important, firms in emerging market can develop their own operations management strategies and capabilities to overcome institutional voids and enhance supply chain performance. These articles illustrate the fundamental challenges brought by institutional voids and provide fresh perspectives on effective supply chain management in emerging markets. |