دانلود رایگان ترجمه مقاله مطالعه نظری در مورد اینترنت و شکاف دانش – Sage 2002
دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی اینترنت و شکاف آگاهی: یک مطالعه تئوری و تجربی به همراه ترجمه فارسی
عنوان فارسی مقاله: | اینترنت و شکاف آگاهی: یک مطالعه تئوری و تجربی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: | The Internet and Knowledge Gaps: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation |
رشته های مرتبط: | مدیریت، مهندسی فناوری اطلاعات، مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، اینترنت و شبکه های گسترده، مدیریت دانش، علوم اجتماعی، مردم شناسی |
فرمت مقالات رایگان | مقالات انگلیسی و ترجمه های فارسی رایگان با فرمت PDF میباشند |
کیفیت ترجمه | کیفیت ترجمه این مقاله پایین میباشد |
نشریه | Sage |
کد محصول | f181 |
مقاله انگلیسی رایگان |
دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
ترجمه فارسی رایگان |
دانلود رایگان ترجمه مقاله |
جستجوی ترجمه مقالات | جستجوی ترجمه مقالات |
بخشی از ترجمه فارسی مقاله: چکیده در بحث عمومی پیرامون پیامدهای اجتماعی جامعه ی اطلاعاتی اغلب به شکاف آگاهی اشاره می شود.از اینرو (Esther Dyson) یا استردایسون (Bill gates) سناریوهای خوشبینانه از آینده مثلاً دیدگاه های بیل گیتز به چالش کشیده می شوند این دیدگاه بر این فرض مبتنی اند که جامعه ی اطلاعاتی ضرورتاً برای همه به معنی یک جامعه ی آگاه است ، ولی منتقدان به دلائل گوناگون نگران اند . آنها از یک شکاف فزاینده واهمه دارند (information- و فقیر اطلاعاتی (information rich) ،مقصود آنها شکاف اجتماعی بین غنی اطلاعاتی است آنها که به کامپیوتر و اینترنت دسترسی ندارند یا شکاف بین «برندگان» و «بازندگان» (فعل ندارد؟)- Poor) . (Ei Chman , 2000 :259) |
بخشی از مقاله انگلیسی: Although the knowledge gap hypothesis is often mentioned in connection with the social consequences of the Information Society, there is little discussion of its theoretical background or specific empirical evidence. Therefore, this article explores the theoretical potential of the knowledge gap perspective for Internet research and presents data based on two recent Internet surveys, which demonstrate a double digital divide. Access to the Internet in Switzerland is still dominated by well-educated, affluent, young males and between 1997 and 2000 the gap between those who do and those who do not have access widened not narrowed. Furthermore, there are gaps in the use of the Internet too. More educated people use the Internet more actively and their use is more information oriented, whereas the less educated seem to be interested particularly in the entertainment functions of the Internet. The knowledge gap hypothesis is often mentioned in the public debate on the social consequences of the Information Society. Thereby optimistic scenarios of the future, like those, for example, of Bill Gates (1995) or Esther Dyson (1997), which are based on the assumption that the information society necessarily means an informed society for everybody, are called into question. But pessimists (e.g. Tapscott, 1996: 13; Golding, 1998: 141ff.; Glotz, 1999: 224ff.; Kubicek and Welling, 2000) are worried for quite opposite reasons. They are afraid of an increasing digital divide, meaning a social gap between the information rich and the information poor – those without access to the computer and the Internet (Negroponte, 1995) – or between ‘users’ and ‘losers’ (Eichmann, 2000: 259ff.). It is predicted that the Internet threatens to divide society into two classes: the information elite on the one hand and those not linked to the Net on the other (Rosenthal, 1999). These concerns seem to be politically important because the underlying assumption is that information and knowledge translate into social power; inequalities in knowledge thus lead to exclusion from social resources and inequalities in social power (McLeod and Perse, 1994). Nevertheless, in the policy context (NTIA, 2000) or in media debates (O’Malley, 2000), there is hardly ever reference made either to the theoretical background of the much cited knowledge gap perspective (Bonfadelli, 1994; Viswanath and Finnegan, 1996; Gaziano and Gaziano, 1996; Kwak, 1999) or to specific empirical evidence supporting the knowledge gap hypothesis. Not only is there a lack of solid empirical data that could demonstrate, for example, the advantages of Internet access over the use of the traditional mass media, but even from a theoretical perspective it is also rather unclear if the policy postulate of Internet access for everybody will be the necessary factor for success in the future – or if access to media or Internet information will be relevant at all. On the contrary, it could be suggested that, above all, growing access and thereby increased availability of information will result in the creation of an information elite and new knowledge gaps due to the Internet (Rosenthal, 1999: 69ff.), as was formulated by the knowledge gap hypothesis for the old mass media. Therefore, this article has a twofold objective: the background and development of the knowledge gap perspective as well as its implications for online communication are outlined in the first, theoretical part of the article. Then the second part discusses some still controversial questions concerning differential access and use of the Internet on the basis of two new empirical Swiss surveys. |