دانلود رایگان ترجمه مقاله چگونه می توان نبرد ایده ها در مسئولیت اجتماعی را پیروز شد (نشریه اسپرینگر ۲۰۱۷) (ترجمه رایگان – برنزی ⭐️)
این مقاله انگلیسی ISI در نشریه اسپرینگر در ۲۳ صفحه در سال ۲۰۱۷ منتشر شده و ترجمه آن ۱۹ صفحه میباشد. کیفیت ترجمه این مقاله رایگان – برنزی ⭐️ بوده و به صورت ناقص ترجمه شده است.
دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی + خرید ترجمه فارسی | |
عنوان فارسی مقاله: |
چگونه می توان نبرد ایده ها در مسئولیت اجتماعی را پیروز شد: مدل هرم بین المللی برای CSR |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: |
How to win the battle of ideas in corporate social responsibility: the International Pyramid Model of CSR |
|
مشخصات مقاله انگلیسی | |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
سال انتشار | ۲۰۱۷ |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | ۲۳ صفحه با فرمت pdf |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
نوع نگارش | مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) |
نوع ارائه مقاله | ژورنال |
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله | مدیریت، حسابداری و اقتصاد |
گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله | مدیریت مالی، اقتصاد مالی، حسابداری مالی |
چاپ شده در مجله (ژورنال) | مجله بین المللی مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکت – International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility |
کلمات کلیدی | مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکتی، مدل هرم کارول، مدل هرم ویزر ، مدل هرم بین المللی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Corporate Social Responsibility – Carroll’s Pyramid Model – Visser’s Pyramid Model – International Pyramid Model |
ارائه شده از دانشگاه | گروه حسابداری ، دانشگاه صنعتی، اردن |
نمایه (index) | DOAJ |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-017-0015-y |
بیس | است ✓ |
مدل مفهومی | دارد ✓ |
پرسشنامه | ندارد ☓ |
متغیر | ندارد ☓ |
رفرنس | دارای رفرنس در انتهای مقاله ✓ |
کد محصول | F1718 |
نشریه | اسپرینگر – Springer |
مشخصات و وضعیت ترجمه فارسی این مقاله | |
فرمت ترجمه مقاله | pdf و ورد تایپ شده با قابلیت ویرایش |
وضعیت ترجمه | انجام شده و آماده دانلود |
کیفیت ترجمه | ترجمه رایگان – برنزی ⭐️ |
تعداد صفحات ترجمه تایپ شده با فرمت ورد با قابلیت ویرایش | ۱۹ صفحه (۴ صفحه رفرنس انگلیسی) با فونت ۱۴ B Nazanin |
ترجمه عناوین تصاویر و جداول | ترجمه شده است ✓ |
ترجمه متون داخل تصاویر | ترجمه نشده است ☓ |
ترجمه متون داخل جداول | ترجمه شده است ✓ |
ترجمه ضمیمه | ندارد ☓ |
ترجمه پاورقی | ندارد ☓ |
درج تصاویر در فایل ترجمه | درج شده است ✓ |
درج جداول در فایل ترجمه | درج شده است ✓ |
منابع داخل متن | درج نشده است ☓ |
منابع انتهای متن | به صورت انگلیسی درج شده است ✓ |
کیفیت ترجمه | کیفیت ترجمه این مقاله متوسط میباشد. |
توضیحات | ترجمه این مقاله به صورت ناقص انجام شده است. |
فهرست مطالب |
چکیده |
بخشی از ترجمه |
چکیده |
بخشی از مقاله انگلیسی |
Abstract This paper reviews the definitions of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as they have evolve over time. It traces the origins of the concept and creates a theoretical framework for international use, thus having the benefit of applicability in both developing as well as developed economies. The models of Carroll and Visser are integrated to produce The International Pyramid Model of CSR, which acknowledges the relative importance of economic, glocal, legal and ethical, and philanthropic aspects of the CSR concept. The primary innovation in the International Pyramid is the development of ‘glocal’ responsibilities, relating to the environment, socio-cultural matters, technology users, and political rights. Additionally, the International Pyramid condenses Carroll (Business Horizons 34(4):39–۴۸, ۱۹۹۱) pyramid such that the separate legal and ethical responsibilities are merged into one ‘legal and ethical’ obligation. Furthermore, it offers flexibility by acknowledging that the various responsibilities it embodies can shift up or down the pyramid as priorities change, which is inevitable as businesses and economies differ cross-sectionally, and over time. ۱- Introduction The idea of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an important one over the last few decades, gradually evolving to reach today’s understanding. However, recent studies have suggested that this understanding of CSR and the way in which it is implemented differs across countries, and time, and that it is the various business communities that have determined the pace of evolution and development in this respect. In fact, CSR has been represented as an umbrella-term covering a diverse range of issues which have grown steadily in importance for business performance at a global level. Porter and Kramer (2006, p.78) argue that, under the scrutiny of government bodies, and activist shareholders, CSR is “an inescapable priority for business leaders in every country”. Hence, as noted by Maron (2006), CSR is applicable in global contexts and a practicality to be absorbed by all businesses within their available resources. Simultaneously, numerous researchers have noted the variation in usage of the associated concepts (Garriga and Mele 2004) as well as the identification of the concrete actions which should be considered (Dahlsrud, 2008). In order to conduct this comprehensive definitional review, and make sense of the continual contributions to more recent conceptual analyses of CSR, it is necessary to begin with the early literature pertaining to CSR which has its roots in the 1950s and 1960s. From that point, the review proceeded through the 1970s, when the topic became more widely discussed among academics, scholars and business community practitioners. In the 1980s, there were fewer new definitions, and companies began to accept that their business and social interests should be part and parcel of their overall operations; and were subsequently more responsive in this connection. By the 1990s, the idea of CSR had become almost universally accepted into alternative thematic frameworks. The 2000s saw CSR having achieved the status of an element of corporate strategy. Dozens of definitions of CSR have arisen in recent years in attempts to articulate the key issues. Indeed, Dahlsrud (2008) provided an analysis of 37 different definitions of CSR, acknowledging that his study did not actually capture all those in existence. The widely-cited definitions, however, are those provided by Carroll (1979, 1991), Visser (2011), and the European Commission (2011). Carroll’s four-part definition of CSR was originally stated as follows: “Corporate social responsibility encompasses the economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary (philanthropic) expectations that society has of organisations at a given point in time” (Carroll 1979, p.500). Visser (2011, p.1) states that CSR is “the way in which business consistently creates shared value in society through economic development, good governance, stakeholder responsiveness and environmental improvement”; and the European Commission (2011, p.2) defines CSR as “a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interactions with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis”, although it has also proposed a simple definition, that being “the responsibility of enterprises for their impacts on society”. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی + خرید ترجمه فارسی | |
عنوان فارسی مقاله: |
چگونه می توان نبرد ایده ها در مسئولیت اجتماعی را پیروز شد: مدل هرم بین المللی برای CSR |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: |
How to win the battle of ideas in corporate social responsibility: the International Pyramid Model of CSR |
|