دانلود رایگان ترجمه مقاله بررسی در مورد آنالیز سهامداران در پروژه های توسعه شهری (نشریه الزویر ۲۰۱۳) (ترجمه رایگان – برنزی ⭐️)
این مقاله انگلیسی ISI در نشریه وایلی در ۱۲ صفحه در سال ۲۰۱۳ منتشر شده و ترجمه آن ۱۱ صفحه میباشد. کیفیت ترجمه این مقاله رایگان – برنزی ⭐️ بوده و به صورت ناقص ترجمه شده است.
دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی + خرید ترجمه فارسی | |
عنوان فارسی مقاله: |
تحقیق در مورد تجزیه و تحلیل سهامداران در پروژه های توسعه شهری: دیدگاه های تجربی یا عقلانی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: |
An investigation of stakeholder analysis in urban development projects: Empirical or rationalistic perspectives |
|
مشخصات مقاله انگلیسی (PDF) | |
سال انتشار | ۲۰۱۳ |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | ۱۲ صفحه با فرمت pdf |
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله | مهندسی معماری، مهندسی شهرسازی |
گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله | مدیریت پروژه و ساخت و طراحی شهری |
چاپ شده در مجله (ژورنال) | مجله بین المللی مدیریت پروژه – International Journal of Project Management |
دانشگاه | دانشکده معماری و محیط زیست، دانشگاه دیکین، استرالیا |
رفرنس | دارد ✓ |
کد محصول | F1274 |
نشریه | الزویر – Elsevier |
مشخصات و وضعیت ترجمه فارسی این مقاله | |
وضعیت ترجمه | انجام شده و آماده دانلود |
تعداد صفحات ترجمه تایپ شده با فرمت ورد با قابلیت ویرایش | ۱۱ صفحه با فونت ۱۴ B Nazanin |
ترجمه عناوین تصاویر و جداول | ترجمه شده است ✓ |
ترجمه متون داخل تصاویر | ترجمه نشده است ☓ |
ترجمه متون داخل جداول | ترجمه شده است ✓ |
درج تصاویر در فایل ترجمه | درج شده است ✓ |
درج جداول در فایل ترجمه | درج شده است ✓ |
کیفیت ترجمه | کیفیت ترجمه این مقاله متوسط میباشد |
توضیحات | ترجمه نصف ای ن مقاله انجام شده است. |
فهرست مطالب |
۱- مقدمه ۲- توجیه های موجود برای تحلیل سهام داران ۳- دیدگاه هایی برای تحلیل سهام داران ۳-۱ طبقه بندی روش های تحلیل سهام داران ۳-۲ روش شناسی دایره سهام داران |
بخشی از ترجمه |
۱- مقدمه ۲- توجیه های موجود برای تحلیل سهام داران |
بخشی از مقاله انگلیسی |
۱- Introduction In the field of urban development, studies usually refer to stakeholders as communities (Lawson and Kearns, 2010; Mahjabeen et al., 2008; Taylor, 2007), public (Innes and Booher, 2004; Oakely, 2007; Shan and Yai, 2011), and civics (Cuthill, 2004; Docherty et al., 2001; McLoughlin, 1969). However, no matter what terminology is used, the core concepts of those studies are to identify and analyse the interests of the organisations and individuals who have a stake in, or can influence, urban development projects, try to accommodate the conflicts among them and focus on the key issues in regional development. In 1969 Arnstein proposed his ‘ladder of participation’: An eight-rung ladder of methods of engagement with the public, rising from ‘non-participation’ or public ‘manipulation’, right up to ‘total-engagement’ or ‘citizen control’ where the public holds the majority or all of the managerial power within the project (Arnstein, 1969). Thereafter, a number of studies in urban development analysed the eight ladders, and selected and tailored their methods to an appropriate engagement level (Larson et al., 2010; Mahjabeen et al., 2008). Various methods, including interviews, forums, focus groups, surveys, and workshops, were proposed and compared for stakeholder engagement in practice (Forester, 1993; Larson et al., 2010). However, as Taylor (2007) stated, although an increasing emphasis is placed on policies on community (stakeholder) participation, many communities, especially the disadvantaged ones, are still on the margins in decision-making processes. The unbalanced stakeholder engagement reflects the fact that democracy in urban development projects is more often rhetoric than realistic in practice. Furthermore, with the complex situation of rapid population growth, large net migration, irresistible climate change, energy and resource limitations in the nation, and the influences of the global economy (Major Cities Unit, 2010), policy makers are confronting significant challenges to address diverse interests, values and objectives, inherent among stakeholders. Therefore, which stakeholders’ voices should have ‘a place at the table’ in urban development process is a dilemma for decision-makers and project teams. In order to efficiently obtain a full picture of stakeholders’ concerns, and effectively manage antagonism, prejudice and conflicts between stakeholders (Robinson, 2005), it is important to consolidate and propose useful stakeholder analysis methods which can be applied practically in the area of urban development. The aims of this paper are to identify stakeholder analysis methods, classify them according to their characteristics, and suggest best practice in stakeholder analysis of urban development projects. This paper is organised in the following manner: Section 2 provides the definition of stakeholder analysis; Section 3 proposes two perspectives for stakeholder analysis, namely, empiricism and rationalism, and emphasises two methods (Stakeholder Circle methodology and Social Network Analysis) from each stakeholder analysis perspective; and Section 4 presents two case studies to illustrate the practical application of the stakeholder analysis perspectives in practice, and discusses the outcomes of the findings in case studies, followed with a conclusion in Section 5.. ۲- Justification for stakeholder analysis As shown in Table 1, previous studies proposed many definitions for stakeholder analysis. Scholars considered stakeholder analysis either as a process or as an approach to support decision making and strategy formulation. Almost all definitions cover the issues of identifying stakeholders and their interests, analysing stakeholders’ impact, and thereby developing strategies. As Jones (2003: p581) stated, it is vitally important in urban development projects to “stress exactly who the participants (stakeholders) are”. Furthermore, only if stakeholders’ real interests are identified, can they be empowered sufficiently in urban development decision-making (Lawson and Kearns, 2010). This paper proposes stakeholder analysis in urban development projects as a process with two key steps, namely, stakeholder identification and stakeholder prioritisation. Herein, stakeholder identification refers to development of a list of stakeholders and identifying their interests regarding urban development; stakeholder prioritisation refers to analysing stakeholders’ influence on urban development, and decisions about which stakeholders’ interests should be addressed preferentially. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی + خرید ترجمه فارسی | |
عنوان فارسی مقاله: |
تحقیق در مورد تجزیه و تحلیل سهامداران در پروژه های توسعه شهری: دیدگاه های تجربی یا عقلانی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: |
An investigation of stakeholder analysis in urban development projects: Empirical or rationalistic perspectives |
|