دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی + خرید ترجمه فارسی
|
|
عنوان فارسی مقاله: |
بررسی نقادانه مدیریت دانش به عنوان ابزار مدیریتی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: |
A critical review of knowledge management as a management tool |
|
مشخصات مقاله انگلیسی و ترجمه فارسی | |
سال انتشار مقاله | 1997 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 12 صفحه با فرمت pdf |
تعداد صفحات ترجمه مقاله | 17 صفحه با فرمت word به صورت تایپ شده با قابلیت ویرایش |
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله | مدیریت دانش |
مجله مربوطه | مجله مدیریت دانش (Journal of Knowledge Management) |
دانشگاه تهیه کننده | دانشکده کسب و کار استکهلم، سوئد |
کلمات کلیدی این مقاله | مدیریت دانش، دانش، استراتژی |
شناسه شاپا یا ISSN | 1367-3270 ISSN |
لینک مقاله در سایت مرجع | لینک این مقاله در سایت Emerald |
نشریه | Emerald |
- بخشی از ترجمه:
- بخشی از مقاله انگلیسی:
Over the past several years there have been intensive discussions about the importance of knowledge management within our society. The management of knowledge is promoted as an important and necessary factor for organisational survival and maintenance of competitive strength. To remain at the forefront organisations need a good capacity to retain, develop, organise, and utilise their employees’ capabilities. Knowledge and the management of knowledge appear to be regarded as increasingly important features for organisational survival. Explores knowledge management with respect to its content, its definition and domain in theory and practice, its use and implications, and to point out some problems inherent in the concept. The main contribution of this paper is an extensive literature survey on knowledge management.
Introduction
Over the past several years there have been intensive discussions about the importance of knowledge management (KM) within our society. Scholars and observers from disciplines as disparate as sociology, economics, and management science agree that a transformation has occurred ± “knowledge” is at centre stage (Davenport et al., 1998). KM and related strategy concepts are promoted as important and necessary components for organisations to survive and maintain their competitive keenness. It has become necessary for managers and executives to address “KM” (Goodman and Chinowsky, 1997). KM is considered a prerequisite for higher productivity and flexibility in both the private and the public sectors. McKern (1996) argues that powerful forces are reshaping the economic and business world and many call for a fundamental shift in organisation processes and human resources strategy. The prime forces of change include globalisation, higher degrees of complexity, new technology, increased competition, changing client demands, and changing economic and political structures. Organisations are beginning to recognise that technology-based competitive advantages are transient and that the only sustainable competitive advantages they have are their employees (Black and Synan, 1997). This development has forced steep learning curves as organisations struggle to adapt quickly, respond faster, and proactively shape their industries (Allee, 1996). To remain at the forefront and maintain a competitive edge organisations must have a good capacity to retain, develop, organise, and utilise their employee competencies (GroÈnhaug and Nordhaug, 1992).IntroductionOver the past several years there have been intensive discussions about the importance of knowledge management (KM) within our society. Scholars and observers from disciplines as disparate as sociology, economics, and management science agree that a transformation has occurred ± “knowledge” is at centre stage (Davenport et al., 1998). KM and related strategy concepts are promoted as important and necessary components for organisations to survive and maintain their competitive keenness. It has become necessary for managers and executives to address “KM” (Goodman and Chinowsky, 1997). KM is considered a prerequisite for higher productivity and flexibility in both the private and the public sectors. McKern (1996) argues that powerful forces are reshaping the economic and business world and many call for a fundamental shift in organisation processes and human resources strategy. The prime forces of change include globalisation, higher degrees of complexity, new technology, increased competition, changing client demands, and changing economic and political structures. Organisations are beginning to recognise that technology-based competitive advantages are transient and that the only sustainable competitive advantages they have are their employees (Black and Synan, 1997). This development has forced steep learning curves as organisations struggle to adapt quickly, respond faster, and proactively shape their industries (Allee, 1996). To remain at the forefront and maintain a competitive edge organisations must have a good capacity to retain, develop, organise, and utilise their employee competencies (GroÈnhaug and Nordhaug, 1992).
دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی + خرید ترجمه فارسی
|
|
عنوان فارسی مقاله: |
بررسی نقادانه مدیریت دانش به عنوان ابزار مدیریتی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله: |
A critical review of knowledge management as a management tool |
|